Vladimir, (01)
Ref my earlier query about Dieter Jenz work: (02)
Since your 2003.10.23 post characterized it as being "Open Source", I
was trying to get a clarification as to whether it is truly open
source (since I did not see the same being identified on Jenz's work
or his website - then, of course, I may just have missed it.) (03)
The term "Open Source" and "Free Software" have well defined meanings
and connotations -- ref., respectively, (04)
"The Open Source Definition" at:
http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php (05)
and (06)
"The Free Software Definition" and "The GNU General Public License"
http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
& http://www.fsf.org/licenses/licenses.html (07)
It is quite possible that Jenz's work is not "open source" work
(unlike software like Protégé, which is available as free software
under the open-source Mozilla Public License (which is an open source
license -- see: http://protege.stanford.edu/download.html). That
clarification would be useful to the community. (08)
Regards,
PPY
-- (09)
PbIKOB__B.B. wrote Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:35:20 +0300: (010)
> Peter -
> ...
> BTW I could not track the deepest shadow of your idea concerning
> my link
>
> You liked Dieter's ontology - but what's wrong? Maybe it is
> interestiong for the list members
>
> Regards
> Vladimir Rykov
> PhD in Computational Linguistics
> MOCKBA
> rykov.narod.ru
> (011)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (012)
|