ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] The Open Source Business Process Management Ontolog

To: rykov-mtd@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Dieter E. Jenz" <dejenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter P. Yim" <yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 09:44:22 -0700
Message-id: <3F9956E6.4000401@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thank you, Vladimir. The material is very interesting indeed.    (01)

I'm relaying Dieter Jenz's post on the [protege-discussion] list for 
those who are interested:    (02)

//
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:37:00 +0200
From: "Dieter E. Jenz" <dejenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: protege-discussion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [protege-discussion] Business Process Management Ontology    (03)


In response to suggestions from reviewers, we have done some further 
work on the Business Process Management Ontology and have extended it. 
In addition, numerous changes have been made in order to include 
support for emerging standards, such as the Business Processing 
Modeling Notation specification.    (04)

The Business Process Ontology supports the definition of private 
(internal) and public (collaborative) processes. In addition, various 
related artifacts, such as business objects and services, that 
implement process activities, can be defined.    (05)

Now that the ontology has undergone significant change, I feel that 
another external review would be helpful. If you are interested in 
participating in the second round of review and provide feedback, you 
can download the current version of the ontology from
http://www.bpiresearch.com/Resources/RE_OSSOnt/re_ossont.htm.    (06)

Please use the following e-mail address for your review comments: 
dejenz<at>bpiresearch.com. The ontology will be made publicly 
available after suggestions from reviewers have been dealt with.    (07)

Regards
Dieter Jenz
//    (08)

-ppy    (09)

P.S. I can only see on their documentation the "(c) Jenz & Partner 
GmbH, 2003. All rights reserved" notice. I have not seen any statement 
on the document or the website ascribing the work to open source of 
free software licensing arrangements. Does anyone know this for sure, 
either way?  -ppy
--    (010)

PbIKOB__B.B. wrote Fri, 24 Oct 2003 16:37:00 +0200:
>   Maybe it would be interesting link for someone ...
> 
> The Open Source Business Process Management Ontology (BPMO)
> 
>   http://www.jenzundpartner.de/Resources/RE_OSSOnt/re_ossont.htm
 >
 >
> -- 
>          Regards
>
>  P bI K O B  B. B.  MOCKBA
>
> Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computational Linguistics,
>  MOSCOW
> http://rykov.narod.ru/
> Engl. http://www.blkbox.com/~gigawatt/rykov.html
> Tel +7-903-749-19-99    (011)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (012)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (013)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>