[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice Concept Wiki Page

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Adam Pease <adampease@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 07:43:11 -0700
Message-id: <>
   We'll ultimately need the functionality of an ontology browser.  Why not 
run an existing browser and then we'll have hyperlinked listings of axioms 
and a hierarchy view already?  You can get a free web-based browser that's 
easy to install from 
<http://einstein.teknowledge.com:8080/SUMO/SUMO_register.jsp?fileType=.zip&fileName=kifb-1-8.tar.gz>.    (01)

You can see it running live at <http://virtual.cvut.cz/kifb/en/>.  That 
browser also addresses the multiple language presentation issue.  It 
already handles a German presentation.  There's a Chinese version of the 
SUMO hierarchy on line at 
   As far as the naming convention, SUMO uses InterCaps.    (02)

Adam    (03)

At 11:41 PM 7/14/2003 -0700, Kurt Conrad wrote:
>Peter and I set up the Invoice concept Wiki page.  It can be found at
>     http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UblOntology/Invoice
>The approach that we took was to first consolidate the various definitions 
>of Invoice that have been passed around.  Once we have settled on the 
>"official" Ontolog definition for invoice, we expect that the material 
>copied from forum postings can be removed.
>We thought about trying to reflect some sort of structure (e.g., class 
>hierarchy) either on the concept page or across concept pages.  This 
>proved to be problematic for a number of reasons.  As a result, the Wiki 
>page includes a Related Concepts section, but the concepts are only listed 
>without any regard to the ways that they are related.
>As we populated the Related Concepts section with examples, we identified 
>a number of issues which should be addressed by the team in the near 
>term.  The most critical ones are:
>1) Determining the naming conventions that we will use for the 
>concepts.  A number of alternatives are listed on the Wiki page.
>2) Ensuring that the concepts that we are defining map cleanly to the 
>concepts identified by the UBL committee.  Toward this end, I populated 
>the Related Concepts section with the concepts listed in the appropriate 
>version 0.7 analysis spreadsheet.
>A Specifications has also been provided.  Although it isn't populated at 
>this time, we expect it to contain (or link) to matching representations 
>(Protoge, KIF, XML Schema, etc.).
>Please review this page with an eye to using the resulting page structure 
>as a model for "all" concept pages.
>/s/ kwc 2003.07.14 23:41
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: 
>mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (05)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>