To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | MDaconta@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:58:14 EDT |
Message-id: | <c.14def5fe.2c3f3b76@xxxxxxx> |
In a message dated 7/10/2003 1:59:40 PM US Mountain Standard Time, adampease@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:My intial assessment is that an Invoice should be a FinancialText. You can Hi Adam, Thanks. Notice this is KIF (as is the financial ontology). Any existing protege version? Otherwise, I'll create what we need for now and add to it as time permits. - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Terms & Definitions [was Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO], Peter P. Yim |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, Adam Pease |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, MDaconta |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, Adam Pease |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |