To: | ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
---|---|
From: | MDaconta@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:35:09 EDT |
Message-id: | <17b.1d095162.2c3f27fd@xxxxxxx> |
In a message dated 7/10/2003 1:05:00 PM US Mountain Standard Time, golsen@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: Your definition, "An invoice is a document which is part of a financial transaction between two or more parties and is a response to an order." is good as far as it goes. But this definition could also represent a "pay-on-receipt ship notice". I would suggest the definition be opened up to include the following: "An invoice is a document which is part of a financial transaction between two or more parties requiring either the payment of monies or the granting of a credit and is a response to an order." Hi Greg, I like the refinement of the definition. The distinction is important. On the issue of SUMO, I found text, under artifact, under CorpuscularObject. The corpuscular part threw me ... I thought it was referring to corpuscles in biology and not the more general diminutive of corpus. Ahhh.... the joys of esoteric definition ;^) - Mike --------------------------------------------------- Michael C. Daconta Chief Scientist, APG, McDonald Bradley, Inc. www.daconta.net |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, Duane Nickull |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, Duane Nickull |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, Duane Nickull |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Invoice ontology and SUMO, MDaconta |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |