No problem, Duane. (01)
Yes ... Farruhk called in, and we had a good discussion. See:
We all agreed to continue to explore the issue over the email forum,
and at a suitable point, do a realtime "meeting" (conference call)
with all the stakeholders and interested parties, and try to map out a
work plan. (03)
Duane Nickull wrote Thu, 26 Jun 2003 14:56:36 -0700:
> Was there any discussion about the registry issue today? Apologies
> again for not being able to make it - I was quadruple booked.
> Duane (05)
> Peter P. Yim wrote:
>> Thanks Farrukh.
>> How about others -- Duane, Leo, Adam, Marion and all who would be
>> interested in the outcome of this matter? Can you join this coming
>> Thursday's conference call (6.26.03 10:30am PDT)?
>> -- (06)
>> Farrukh Najmi wrote Tue, 24 Jun 2003 18:42:39 -0400:
>>> Peter P. Yim wrote:
>>>> Maybe we could kick-off some discussion on this coming Thurday's
>>>> conference call (6.26.03 10:30am PDT) if some of you who are
>>>> interested can join in.
>>>> Let's find out who can call in this Thursday, so that Kurt can
>>>> decide if he should put that on the agenda.
>>> I can join around 11am PDT due to a regular conflict that I cannot
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)