Peter - thank you very much for your good answer. (01)
Sorry - I have not time to take part in our discussion in full scale I would
like to. I am running here the mixture of biz intelligence/computer linguistics
projects like race dog ... (02)
But I watch it as much as I can. (03)
Vladimir (04)
>fyi ...
>
>[ thought members here will find this post interesting and
>encouraging. -ppy ]
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject: RE: [ubl] FYI: Article - OASIS Proposes Standard for Business
>Documents (But will companies adopt common language that crosses
>industries?)
>Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 08:52:56 +1000
>From: "Steve Capell" <steve.capell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: "'Grimley Michael J NPRI'" <GrimleyMJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'UBL
>\(E-mail\)'" <ubl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>Here's my take on that article:
>
>The value of UBL is not in the collection of horizontal documents such
>as order & invoice. The value is in the naming and design rules
>methodology that is harmonised with UN/CEFACT core components. OAG,
>xCBL, RosettaNet, and many other horizontal and vertical standards are
>also moving toward harminisation of core components.
>
>The difficulty in cross-industry collaboration is not whether the
>document is this format or that (syntax issue) - the real problem is
>in the meaning of the content (semantic issue). Harmonisation of
>semantics through efforts such as UN/CEFACT core components (and the
>W3C "semantic web" for that matter) is the key to interoperability.
>UBL provides by far the best example of a message construction
>methodology that leads to improved semantic interoperability.
>
>If all the different industry standards kept their libraries of
>business messages but used the UBL naming & design rules as a
>"reference implementation" as they move towards harmonisation of the
>components (building blocks such as an <address> element) then UBL
>will have been an outstanding success.
>
>Regards,
>
>Steve Capell
>RedWahoo
>Sydney, Australia
>Tel : +61 410 437854
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Grimley Michael J NPRI [mailto:GrimleyMJ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Saturday, 17 May 2003 3:24 AM
>To: UBL (E-mail)
>Subject: [ubl] FYI: Article - OASIS Proposes Standard for Business
>Documents (Bu t will companies adopt common language that crosses
>industries?)
>
>
>http://www.sdtimes.com/news/078/story3.htm
>
>Thank You,
>Michael Grimley
>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (05)
--
Regards (06)
P bI K O B B. B. MOCKBA (07)
Vladimir Rykov, PhD in Computational Linguistics,
MOSCOW
http://rykov.narod.ru/
Engl. http://www.blkbox.com/~gigawatt/rykov.html
Tel +7-903-749-19-99 (08)
--
Спам - болезнь Сети. За температурой можно следить на странице мониторинга
(http://mail.yandex.ru/monitoring/). (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (010)
|