[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Proposal for UBL Ontology Project

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: MDaconta@xxxxxxx
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2003 11:53:37 EST
Message-id: <144.c0d9d90.2b963411@xxxxxxx>
In a message dated 3/3/2003 12:23:13 PM US Mountain Standard Time, yimpp@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

6. Question: who has working proficiency with protégé and is willing
to provide some working guidance/leadership there? Please indicate so.
Based on our earlier survey, protégé is definitely a candidate
tool/platform where we can build the ontology on.

Though I don't consider myself a protege expert, I have a working
proficiency and am willing to provide guidance as best as I can.  In
that vein, I would recommend everyone be familiar with the
ontology development guide at the stanfard site called
Ontology 101 available at:

This guide also lays out a simple process for ontology development
that we should consider following.

I am looking forward to working on this!

- Mike
Michael C. Daconta
Chief Scientist, Advanced Programs Group
McDonald Bradley, Inc.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>