Re: [ontolog-forum] Proposal for UBL Ontology Project

[MDaconta@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 3/3/2003 6:48:48 PM US Mountain Standard Time, lobrst@xxxxxxxxx writes:

> We've initially identified Protege because it's free, open-source itself,
> pretty versatile. Unfortunately, I am not aware of concurrent ontology
> development tools (though VerticalNet originally was developing such), which
> would be nicer.


I would also recommend protege.  We are using it now, in conjunction 
with the OntoViz plugin, and find it adequate.  Though I am not familiar
with all the available plugins, I believe this choice would set the representation
language as RDFS as that is what protege produces.

 - Mike
-------------------------------
Michael C. Daconta
Chief Scientist, Advanced Programs Group
McDonald Bradley, Inc.
www.daconta.net