Adam
> Sorry for the delay in reply. I think I'm very close to being in
> agreement with you. I guess I'd summarize this exchange that "An XML
> encoding of KIF would allow one to use a declarative scripting language
> (included in the Windows operating system) for storage, presentation and
> transformation, as a slight cost of more complicated syntax." Is that
> close to how you'd summarize this? (01)
Exactly how I would summarise it, except for the "as" which should be an
"at". (02)
Martin (03)
--
To post messages mailto:ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
An archive of the [ontolog] forum can be found
at http://ontolog.cim3.org/forums/ontolog (04)
|