All, (01)
Thank you, Rex, for the detailed response. (02)
> [Rex] I vote for 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_9_7 for
> Emergency Response. However, I would
> MUCH Prefer 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_8_31 for
> Emergency Response. (03)
[ppy] I am fine with either option. That gives us a good
're-starter' to poll everyone with ... (04)
Bob and Duane ... please indicate your (a) feasibility, and (b)
preference with Rex's two stated options (propose more if neither
would work) shown below: (05)
(A) 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_8_31 for Emergency Response (06)
(B) 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_9_7 for Emergency Response (07)
Any other comments welcomed (Kurt, Leo, ...)! (08)
Thanks & regards. =ppy
-- (09)
Rex Brooks wrote Sun, 21 May 2006 16:31:07 -0700:
> Bob, Peter, Duane,
>
> Responses inline:
>
>> Rex, Bob & Duane,
>>
>> What we have now on the planner, is:
>>
>> # Ontolog Scheduled Discussion - Ontologies in Emergency Response
>> Applications (Moderators: RexBrooks & BobSmith) - Thursday
>> ConferenceCall_2006_08_10
>>
>> # Ontolog Scheduled Discussion - Ontologies and Service Oriented
>> Architecture (Moderators: DuaneNickull & RexBrooks) - Thursday
>> ConferenceCall_2006_08_24
>>
>> [ref:
>>
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/Ontolog-planning/Ontolog_Event_Plan_2006_20060309m.doc
>
>> &
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?MeetingsCalls#nidMF6 ]
>>
>> Question: Do we really want to schedule these two discussions so close
>> to each other?
>
> No. Unless we can specifically relate Emergency Response Applications to
> Ontologies and SOA. I am doing exactly that as part of the SOA for
> E-Government Conference Tuesday and Wednesday of this week, so it is
> possible. I would not mind expanding the Emergency Response topic to
> include SOA in specifically relating Registries, Emergency Alerting,
> Health Informatics and Geospatial Services. We could invite Farrukh and
> Carl Mattocks for registry-specific topics and perhaps one or two people
> from Department of Homeland Security Disaster Management Services, such
> as Gary Ham of Battelle who rides herd on Disaster Management
> Inteoperability Services' OPEN API architecture which implements CAP and
> EDXL. However the Cons for this approach is that the focus is narrow and
> the audience might conclude that this SOA with Ontologies are only good
> for this small intersection.
>
>> o Pros: (a) we can dig deeper into the subject matter (especially
>> where they overlap); (b) we can have these sessions leverage on each
>> other get some synergy from having two (related and continuous)
>> sessions rather than just one, and (c) this might provide a better
>> draw for participants
>
> Agreed. It would also be convenient for me.
>
>> o Cons: (a) this demands a lot more of the organizers within a short
>> time; (b) our nominal plan is to only have one invited speaker and one
>> discussion session every month (and I was actually we can return to
>> that after the F2F), and (c) then, we might lose participants because
>> we are scheduling too many events.
>>
>> The three of you should make the call. Please let me know:
>>
>> (i) do you want to keep the session order (SOA after EmergencyResp) or
>> would you rather flip it around (and have EmergencyResp after the SOA
>> discussion, which I feel, makes more sense, but that's only a personal
>> opinion.)
>
> I would switch it around so that SOA sets up Emergency Response, since,
> then all the various services combined in Emergency Response is easier
> to understand as a subset of SOA.
>
>> (ii) do you still want to keep the two dates as stated above, or would
>> you rather shift one of them into September 2006.
>
> For me that just makes September more difficult since we have an
> Emergency Response Summit in Huntsville, Alabama or Atlanta, Georgia
> around September 22-23. It is an OASIS Interop Demo and it leads
> directly into the combined OASIS-ITU Emergency Alerting event October
> 19- 20 in Geneva.
>
>> (iii) If the latter, which one would we want to feature in September,
>> and please pick a date (Thursday, preferably) now.
>
> I vote for 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_9_7 for Emergency Response.
> However, I would MUCH Prefer 2006_8_10 for SOA and 2006_8_31 for
> Emergency Response.
>
> Regards,
> Rex
>
>> Feel free to continue the e-mail discussion before deliberating.
>>
>> Let's try to lock in the dates soon (rather than later) so that things
>> can start rolling.
>>
>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>> -- (010)
>> Peter P. Yim wrote Thu, 18 May 2006 18:48:58 -0700:
>>> Rex & Bob,
>>>
>>> Thu 2006.08.10 it will be for the "Ontology Applications in
>>> Emergency Response" Panel Discussion session.
>>>
>>> Thanks. =ppy
>>> -- (011)
>>> Rex Brooks wrote Thu, 18 May 2006 17:57:09 -0700:
>>>> Peter, Everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I think we should stay with the revised date of 2006.8.10. I think
>>>> we can do a better job of it then.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Rex (012)
>>>> At 4:48 PM -0700 5/18/06, Bob Smith wrote:
>>>>> My Day Stretcher yields at once to Rex's Day Stretcher...
>>>>>
>>>>> (Later is often preferred to Earlier...)
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> Bob (013)
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
>>>>> Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:02 PM
>>>>> To: West, Matthew R SIPC-DFD/321; Michael Maximilien; Conor Shankey
>>>>> Cc: [ontolog-admin]; Michael Maximilien; Timothy Redmond; Pat
>>>>> Cassidy; Bob
>>>>> Smith; Kurt Conrad; Rex Brooks; Denise Bedford
>>>>> Subject: Ontolog Talks and Discussion Schedule - Jun/July-2006
>>>>>
>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Further to our discussion this morning (ref:
>>>>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2006_05_18#nidN8V
>>>>>
>>>>> )
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just spoken to Natasha and concluded that we will have to do
>>>>> without
>>>>> the "Ontology Development on Protege" talk for this series (as they
>>>>> have a
>>>>> mission critical task at hand that isn't delivered until 6/15~20, and
>>>>> therefore Natasha doesn't think they can put together the talk we
>>>>> would want
>>>>> for 6/15 or 22).
>>>>>
>>>>> As such, the schedule now reads:
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.06.01 - Matthew West - Application Integration / ISO 18876
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.06.08 - no (special) event
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.06.15 - Moderators: EMichaelMaximilien / ConorShankey -
>>>>> Ontologizing
>>>>> the Ontolog Body of Knowledge, Discussion Session-2
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.06.22 - ** (see below)
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.05.29 - Timothy Redmond - Protege architecture & API
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.07.06 - no (special) event
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.07.13 - Pat Cassidy - From Controlled Vocabulary to Formal
>>>>> Ontology
>>>>>
>>>>> # 2006.07.23 - Ontolog F2F workshop, Organizers: BobSmith,
>>>>> KurtConrad &
>>>>> RexBrooks - Natural, Semi-Formal, and Formal
>>>>> Ontologies: Bridging the Layers, Limits, and Lacunas
>>>>>
>>>>> Remarks:
>>>>>
>>>>> (a) the 2006.06.22 date is now "available" again ...
>>>>> ** Rex & Bob, your call to either continue the "Ontology
>>>>> Applications in
>>>>> Emergency Response" Panel Discussion on that date as originally
>>>>> planned, or
>>>>> you may opt to roll that one out on the later 2006.08.10 date (as we
>>>>> discussed during today's call.) Please advise your disposition.
>>>>>
>>>>> (b) except for the 7/23/06 F2F, which will be a full-day event at
>>>>> Stanford,
>>>>> CA, USA, all sessions are scheduled above are 2-hour virtual sessions
>>>>> starting at: 10:30 AM PDT / 1:30 PM EDT / 17:30 UTC on the
>>>>> respective dates.
>>>>>
>>>>> All: please acknowledge and advise immediately if you still want
>>>>> any part of
>>>>> the above schedule modified. We need to tie down all the dates before
>>>>> end-of-day tomorrow. I'll follow-up with necessary administrivia
>>>>> after that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks & regards. =ppy
>>>>> --
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (014)
|