Garret, (01)
If you could set your email preferences to have your post to this
address be "text only" (and line wrapped at 65 characters per line),
your posts will be captured into the archives with "purple numbers"
automatically assigned. (The parser doesn't work well with messages
when they are in html now.) (02)
See:
[without purple numbers]:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/2004-06/msg00029.html (03)
[with purple numbers]:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/2004-06/msg00024.html (04)
The purple numbers will come in handy when we need to refer to any
particular point in the message (if your separate your points into
paragraphs, and leave a blank line in between paragraphs). (05)
For more info about purple numbers, see:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?PurpleNumbers (06)
Thanks. -ppy
-- (07)
Garret Minakawa wrote Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:35:39 -0700: (08)
> Sigma on cim3.net is down so I probably won't make any additional
> progress before this afternoon's con call. Following are my notes as
> I started to go through the spreadsheet (it's not much but at least
> it's a start)
>
> _Core Component Types_. The 10 CCTs do not technically have any data
> associated with
> them. The Primary Supplemental Component (*.Content) is where the
> value associated with the CCT belongs. The CCT itself is merely a
> container to hold the Primary Supplemental Component and Secondary
> Supplemental Components associated with the CCT.
>
> For example:
>
> Amount. Type contains
> Amount. Content (Primary Supplemental Component)
> Amount Currency. Identifier (Secondary Supplemental Component)
> Amount Currency. Code List Version. Identifier (Secondary
> Supplemental Component)
>
> If Amount. Type was used as the CCT associated with Invoice. Amount,
> and the value for Invoice. Amount was $10.00 USD, and the code "USD"
> was taken from version 1997-2 of ISO 4217, the full representation of
> this value would be
>
> Invoice. Amount
> 10.00 = Amount. Content
> USD = Amount Currency. Identifier
> 1997-2 = Amount Currency. Code List Version. Identifier
>
> Therefore, I'm not sure how the CCTs should be mapped to SUMO.
>
> _Amount. Content_. I don't think I would have chosen monetaryValue as
> the mapping for this data element. The name (monetaryValue) seems to
> make sense but the attributes associated with monetaryValue
> (specifically, Object) seem to be a bit too limiting.
>
> My interpretation of monetaryValue is representing the value of some
> "thing" like a car, building, furniture, etc. Amount. Content can be
> used to represent any monetary value - not necessarily just the value
> of some object.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
>To Post: mailto:cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation
>Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/CCT-Representation/
>Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
>
> (09)
_________________________________________________________________
To Post: mailto:cctont-imp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/cctont-imp/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?CctRepresentation
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/CCT-Representation/
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (010)
|