Re: [sio-dev] Sharing and Integrating Ontologies

[rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Cory, John B. & All:

CC> The following is copied from a response to John(s) on the AESIG list about FOL
> with respect to our needs to integrate architectures:
> 1) First order isn't good enough
> 2) It is too hard
> 3) It is fragile and does not deal with inconsistency well.

<snip>

CC> So this will probably get me in deep water on this list, but it seems like there is an
> over-emphasis on FOL.
> -Cory Casanave

The AE group may find CASL specifications of Foundational UML and RDFS
more compelling in the short term. But recall that Institutions are central to HETS as they were to our Roadmap for Semantics in
Netcentric Enterprise Architecture.

--
Rick

http://phaneron.rickmurphy.org
_________________________________________________________________ 
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/sio-dev/   
Join Community: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/sio-dev/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:sio-dev-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Community Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/SIO/ 
Community Wiki: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?SharingIntegratingOntologies     (01)