Ravi's point is very useful. many W3C working group does archive the
IRC log and leave them online, e.g.
http://www.w3.org/2004/03/05-swbp-irc
http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20071129 (01)
As we are expecting better outreach to ontology community, this effort
would keep our meeting content more visible and tractable by
complementing our Wiki pages for each meeting. (02)
best,
Li (03)
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Sharma, Ravi <Ravi.Sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Peter, Team
> I agree with Evan and I have been using Soaphub in our Ontolog
> presentations and it also allows me to capture chat and email to me at
> my Google email address.
> Thanks.
>
> Ravi
>
> (Dr. Ravi Sharma) Senior Enterprise Architect
>
> Vangent, Inc. Technology Excellence Center (TEC)
>
> 8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 310, Vienna VA 22182
> (o) 703-827-0638, (c) 313-204-1740 www.vangent.com
>
> Professional viewpoints do not necessarily imply organizational
> endorsement.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:oor-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Evan Wallace
> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 3:52 PM
> To: OpenOntologyRepository-discussion
> Subject: Re: [oor-forum] using irc as supplementary communication
> channel
>
>
>> Nominally (although we generally only use this during Ontolog events,
>> like invited talks or panel discussions), we have been using "soaphub"
>> - a browser-based queue/chat tool that came out of IBM alphaworks
>> (back in 2005).
>>
>> See, for example:
>>
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2008_04_03#nid1D2
> 4
>>
>> Let's find out from the callers, what people think about adding some
>> sort of 'chat' capability, to augment our regular team meetings.
>>
>> ALL:
>>
>> o like it, let's add 'chat' into our regular team conference calls.
>> If so, would you prefer the 'soaphub' tool, IRC, or something else?
>>
>> o think we are doing fine now, with an agenda on the wiki,
>> predominantly a voice conference, a chair, and a realtime note-taker
>>
>> o ... comments, preferences, more ideas, ...?
>>
> Including a separate chat channel in the mix is a good thing. It can
> often be
> hard to get a word in edgewise in ontolog related meetings. This would
> enable more voices to be heard. That can get a little out of hand at
> times,
> but that problem is manageable and the benefit outweighs the risk.
>
> I have no preference on chat tools/technology.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
>
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
> Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
> Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository
> (04)
--
Li Ding
http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~dingl/ (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (06)
|