> Nominally (although we generally only use this during Ontolog events,
> like invited talks or panel discussions), we have been using "soaphub"
> - a browser-based queue/chat tool that came out of IBM alphaworks
> (back in 2005).
>
> See, for example:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2008_04_03#nid1D24
>
> Let's find out from the callers, what people think about adding some
> sort of 'chat' capability, to augment our regular team meetings.
>
> ALL:
>
> o like it, let's add 'chat' into our regular team conference calls.
> If so, would you prefer the 'soaphub' tool, IRC, or something else?
>
> o think we are doing fine now, with an agenda on the wiki,
> predominantly a voice conference, a chair, and a realtime note-taker
>
> o ... comments, preferences, more ideas, ...?
>
Including a separate chat channel in the mix is a good thing. It can
often be
hard to get a word in edgewise in ontolog related meetings. This would
enable more voices to be heard. That can get a little out of hand at times,
but that problem is manageable and the benefit outweighs the risk. (01)
I have no preference on chat tools/technology. (02)
-Evan (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/oor-forum/
Subscribe: mailto:oor-forum-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/oor-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OOR/
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OpenOntologyRepository (04)
|