Hi All, (01)
While I do not wish to overshadow all of the dialogue that has taken
place since Andrea's initial email, I do have a comment to make that
is more specific to the original question of reusable content on the
Semantic Web. (02)
I think an important focus to incorporate for Track A relating to the
topic of reusable content on the semantic web might be: how can we
make the content itself (i.e., semantic web ontologies) more reusable?
- What kinds of best practices should be adopted (specifically, with
respect to the non-functional attributes of ontology design)?
- What sort of metadata is the most useful when identifying a
suitable ontology for reuse? (03)
These questions take a slightly different perspective than many of
those that have been posed so far, which seem more content-oriented to
me. Despite this, I think they are also key questions that can serve
to better inform the challenges in the scope this track. Further, I
think that it is quite feasible that we might obtain a satisfactory
consensus/collection of answers to these question during this year's
summit, from the collective experiences of the participants.
Look forward to hearing your thoughts on this. (04)
Megan (05)
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Andrea Westerinen
<arwesterinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Other important questions in the "reusable content" arena are how to
> ascertain and improve the amount of reuse.
>
> It "seems" that reuse is low, but there are many sites offering reusable
> content and therefore many opportunities for reuse. For example, in the
> Ontology Design Pattern (ODP) space, there are:
>
> - W3C'S Ontology Engineering and Patterns Task Force (OEP) [1]
> - Ontology Design Patterns org wiki [2]
> - ODP Public Catalog [3]
>
> In addition, there are foundational ontologies available, as discussed in
> the Upper Ontology Summit (2006) [4], as well as domain ontologies like
> FIBO.
>
> So, does the wealth of information contradict the perception?
>
> Or, is content present but it is just very difficult to use/re-use?
>
> Perhaps we need to refine our engineering approaches and abilities to better
> find and evaluate reusable content? This is discussed in a paper by María
> Poveda-Villalón, Mari Carmen Suárez-Figueroa and Asunción
>Gómez-Pérez
> [5] that I found quite interesting.
>
> I personally would love to see a review and recommendation system put in
> place for ontologies, patterns, linked data models, etc. Is this something
> that we could achieve?
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/OEP/
> [2] http://ontologydesignpatterns.org/wiki/Main_Page
> [3] http://www.gong.manchester.ac.uk/odp/html/index.html
> [4] http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit
> [5]
>
>http://oa.upm.es/5432/1/REUSING_ONTOLOGY_DESIGN_PATTERNS_IN_A_CONTEXT_ONTOLOGY_NETWORK.pdf
>
> --
> Andrea Westerinen
> T: 425.891.8407
> arwesterinen@xxxxxxxxx or andreaw@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?AndreaWesterinen
> organizingknowledge.blogspot.com
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (07)
|