To: | Ontology Summit 2014 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:56:28 -0500 |
Message-id: | <CAMhe4f26H7fSwFFkn5Wkz_jZs3u3HEuo+61WM-nCxnFq02RmhQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
I have tended to think (perhaps lazily) of modular ontologies as things like the upper-level Semantic Web for Earth and Environmental Terminology (SWEET) developed by Raskin ar NASA’s Jet Propulsion lab for Earth system science (http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/ontology/). These are really mostly subject areas, they call realms, as it says on their site:
modules on Representation, State, Matter, Quantity etc.
And it might be worth mentioning that there was an "attempt" at making some new construction easier by a facet approach. The large SWEET ontology collection of concepts and terms, is divided into orthogonal dimensions or facets (http://sweet.jpl.nasa.gov/guide.doc). I'm not sure I buy this simplification of independent/orthogonal concepts but they tried a faceted design using combinations of terms across ontologies in order to make compound terms with compound meaning. An example I saw in:
was a term air in one of the ontology modules and another term temperature in the same or other SWEET ontology, we can combine the two terms to make a compound term "air temperature".
of course not all concepts add so simply... Gary Berg-Cross, Ph.D.
NSF INTEROP Project
SOCoP Executive Secretary Knowledge Strategies Potomac, MD
240-426-0770 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:03 PM, Andrea Westerinen <arwesterinen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] [ReusableContent] Partitioning the problem, Wartik, Steven P \"Steve\" |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] The tools are not the problem (yet), Matthew West |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] [ReusableContent] Reuse of Linked Data vis-a-vis Reuse of Ontologies, Andrea Westerinen |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] [ReusableContent] Reuse of Linked Data vis-a-vis Reuse of Ontologies, Gary Berg-Cross |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |