On 1/18/2014 1:33 AM, Matthew West wrote:
> - What is it that takes a lot of time and effort?
>
> - What is it that is very expensive?
>
> - What is it that is held up because of a lack of scarce resources?
>
> - Why is it that ontological approaches are not taken when they
> could/should be? (01)
1. Learning and inter-weaving open-source ontologies from W3, schema.org
and elsewhere. Development (design, coding & testing) of software to
store, validate or display queries of resources/properties for a given
ontology.
2. Changes to my methodology for best practice ontologies. Changes to my
ontology's hierarchies.
3. Development of statistical entity/attribute analysis software.
4. The ontology 'industry' got off on the wrong foot: ontologies are
more complex than they need to be. The most glaring symptom is they are
about TWICE the size necessary, as properties are defined which
duplicate classes. A second symptom emanates from the simple fact that
ontologists are needed at all, to interface between SMEs and ontologies
composed of weird techno-jargon. The root issue in both cases is the
W3's physical design for the RDF; unfortunately it's not semantic but
rather might/should be considered a compromised relational database model. (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2014/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2014
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (03)
|