Fyi ... (01)
... this is an exchange that may be of interest to those who are
struggling with handling the volume of traffic generated by the level
of activities of the ongoing Ontology Summit. (02)
The cited reference at:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/2012-01/msg00002.html
is of particular relevance too. (03)
Regards. =ppy
-- (04)
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 3:55 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: ontology-summit Digest, Vol 34, Issue 21
To: James Zaiss <jameszaiss@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-admin] forum" <ontolog-admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (05)
Jim, (06)
Thank you for the message. (07)
There are three thresholds that trigger the mailing list system
("mailman" is what we use) to send out a digest:
- every 24 hours
- when it has accumulated 25 "new" messages
- when the accumulated "new" messages reached a certain size (08)
The fact that most of our contributors make top posts, write fairly
long messages, and retained a lot of the earlier parts of the thread
for context, has made messages quite longer (and big). Hence the more
numerous digest despatches that you are seeing. On your request, I
have just raised that size threshold from 30KB to 150KB. Let's see if
this helps. (Honestly, you are the first to make such a request.) (09)
That said, rather than "following the discussion threads" via the
delivered digests, I would suggest you look into doing so via the html
message archives (which are available in monthly indices, by date and
by thread) at: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ ...
like,
- http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2012-01/index.html ... or,
- http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/2012-01/threads.html (010)
Please take a look at this recent exchange too, where I suggested to
one of our participants to use a local mail filter on a 'normal
delivery mode', instead of going with the 'digest mode' (or more
importantly, instead of 'unsubscribing'.)
- see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-admin/2012-01/msg00002.html (011)
This is especially relevant in your case, since, as you would have
noticed, there is quite a bit of discussion about Cyc that has been
going on. I'm sure, given your Cyc experience, the community would
love to have you chime in (and you can't really do it well, and
maintain the threads, if you are working off a digest.) Please
consider that. (012)
Thanks & regards. =ppy (013)
p.s. hope you don't mind my sharing this exchange with the rest of the
community. =ppy
-- (014)
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:55 PM, James Zaiss <jameszaiss@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Peter,
>
> Is it possible to create a more comprehensive version of the ontology-summit
>Digest? I must have received about 20 ontology-summit e-mails Wednesday, many
>consisting of only a single posting -- and several of those contained only a
>single new sentence! I am interested in following some of the threads; but
>for me, it would be much more convenient to receive, say, at most one Digest
>e-mail per day.
>
> Regards,
> Jim Zaiss
> (015)
> --- On Wed, 2/1/12, ontology-summit-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
><ontology-summit-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> From: ontology-summit-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
><ontology-summit-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: ontology-summit Digest, Vol 34, Issue 21
> To: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wednesday, February 1, 2012, 10:31 PM
>
> Send ontology-summit mailing list submissions to
> ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> ontology-summit-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> ontology-summit-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of ontology-summit digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: [BigSystems and SystemsEngineering] Systemofsystems
> (joseph simpson)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
> (016)
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: joseph simpson <jjs0sbw@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Ontology Summit 2012 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:30:56 -0800
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [BigSystems and SystemsEngineering]
>Systemofsystems
> Yes, Jack it is very simple.
>
> Have fun,
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:16 PM, Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Joseph, Our difference is the simple issue of ...[snip]... (017)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2012/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2012
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (018)
|