To: | rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Mills Davis <millsdavis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Michael F Uschold <uschold@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:20:27 -0700 |
Message-id: | <BANLkTi=BHdiFzwQr_z-LRjQJdD+A4W6G0w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
This is great, Rex. One very important thing is missing: how exactly does the ontology add value? I know this is difficult, but in some ways it is the most important thing of all. We cannot make a case for ontology if we cannot explain how the ontology adds value. Can you and Mills try to come up with a sentence or two for as many of the case studies as possible? This is needed for me to include any of the case studies in the communique.
Michael On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi Everyone, -- Michael Uschold, PhD Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts LinkedIn: http://tr.im/limfu
Skype, Twitter: UscholdM _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontology-summit] CASEstudy-UseCase Matrix, Rex Brooks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Communiqué, Michael F Uschold |
Previous by Thread: | [ontology-summit] CASEstudy-UseCase Matrix, Rex Brooks |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] CASEstudy-UseCase Matrix, Rex Brooks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |