I am NIST. Several conferences are already being rescheduled due to the US government shutdown.
Looking at the last column, I'm sure there was more about value
propositions that we had in Track 2, I don't mind cross referencing
and making sure this is in the table.
On 08/04/2011 15:53, Rex Brooks wrote:
I think we can add that into the last column since there is room
for it along with the Value Model and Proposition.
I will work on it. Those who have specific requests, please send
them to me and I will do my best to shoe horn them in.
On 4/8/11 7:20 AM, Michael F Uschold wrote:
This is great, Rex. One very important thing is
missing: how exactly does the ontology add value? I know this
is difficult, but in some ways it is the most important thing of
all. We cannot make a case for ontology if we cannot explain
how the ontology adds value. Can you and Mills try to come up
with a sentence or two for as many of the case studies as
This is needed for me to include any of the case studies in
Michael Uschold, PhD
Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
Starbourne Communications Design
GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison
Berkeley, CA 94702
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
89 Worship Street
London EC2A 2BF
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7917 9522
Mob: +44 (0) 7721 420 730
Registered in England and Wales No. 2461068