I have found that when the topic concerns new and strange technology then the prospect is much more interested in maximizing career longevity (1-Risk) than value for money.On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:19 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote: Good point to be clear on, Jack.
Adrian said money, not profits. I put a too-narrow interpretation on it, my bad.
I think we can all can agree that non-profits, government and military are all very interested in getting better value for money.
Michael On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I dislike having to post too many 'objections' per day but does the following say that there is no case for ontologies in government, military, non-profit?
On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote:
> Making the case for ontology ultimately is never going to succeed unless it comes down to more profits.
-- Michael Uschold, PhD Senior Ontology Consultant, Semantic Arts
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
|
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01)
|