ontology-summit
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontology-summit] [strategy] Blank Stares and Semantic Technology: A

To: Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Jack Ring <jring7@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:06:56 -0700
Message-id: <55D4352D-1BF8-49F1-B210-804913EAACA9@xxxxxxxxx>
I dislike having to post too many 'objections' per day but does the following 
say that there is no case for ontologies in government, military, non-profit?    (01)

On Mar 3, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote:    (02)

> Making the case for ontology  ultimately is never going to succeed unless it 
>comes down to more profits.    (03)


_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/   
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011  
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/     (04)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>