-1 for 15926, with arguments:
http://ontology.buffalo.edu/bfo/west.pdf
BS (01)
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 1:50 PM, Steve Ray <steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Forwarded to the list for more general consumption.
>
>
>
> Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
>
> Distinguished Research Fellow
>
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
> NASA Research Park
>
> Building 23 (MS 23-11)
>
> P.O. Box 1
> Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
>
> Email: steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Phone: (650) 587-3780
>
> Cell: (202) 316-6481
>
>
>
> From: Hans Teijgeler [mailto:hans.teijgeler@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 3:06 AM
> To: steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: FW: [ontolog-invitation] Invitation to a brainstorming call for the
> 2011 Ontology Summit
>
>
>
> Good morning Steve,
>
>
>
> I think that you should include ISO 15926.
>
> There is a lot of interest and activity around the globe to implement this
> standard, using W3C Semantic Web technologies.
>
>
>
> Officially it is for integration, sharing, exchange, and hand-over of plant
> lifecycle information in the process industries (oil refineries, chemical
> plants, etc), but in fact it is highly generic.
>
> It could easily be used for healthcare, but as easily also for real estate
> information.
>
> To enable that one has to build or adapt a Reference Library with
> domain-specific concepts as an extension of the RDL with core classes, as
> defined in ISO 15926-4.
>
>
>
> Please contact Onno Paap of Fluor and/or Robin Benjamins of Bechtel.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> ___________
>
> Hans Teijgeler
>
> Laanweg 28
>
> 1871 BJ Schoorl
>
> 072-509 2005
>
> hans.teijgeler@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> www.15926.info
>
>
>
> P Spaar een boom. Druk deze e-mail niet af tenzij het echt nodig is ....
>
> Save a tree. Don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary....
>
> Sauvez un arbre... Ne pas imprimer ce mail, sauf si cela est strictement
> nécessaire...
>
> Salvar un árbol. No imprima este e-mail a menos que sea realmente necesario
> ....
>
> Khusela umthi. Suku shicilela lomyalezo/"e-mail" ngaphandle xa kufuneka
> ngokwenene....
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: ontolog-invitation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontolog-invitation-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Ray
> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:51
> To: ontolog-invitation@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ontolog-invitation] Invitation to a brainstorming call for the
> 2011 Ontology Summit
>
> Colleagues,
>
> The time has come for us to finalize our plans for the 2011
> Ontology Summit. The organizing committee has identified a base theme for
> the summit, and we would now like to invite you to participate in a
> conference call on December 16th to brainstorm on refining and finalizing
> this theme. Developing details (including dial-in information) are available
> on the session page at:
>
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2010_12_16
>
>
>
> Overall theme: Making the case for Ontology
>
> This summit will collect and curate a small number of perspectives and case
> studies for which we will strive to assemble ROI information (monetary and
> otherwise) as well as statements of the problem and solution approach, in
> support of providing solid material to draw upon when making the business
> case for both the application as well as the R&D investment in Ontology.
>
> Subthemes – Groups of participants making the case in the following domains:
>
> • Healthcare informatics and Biomedical
>
> • Cyberphysical systems
>
> • Cloud (massively parallel) computing
>
> • Traditional engineering applications (civil, mechanical,
> aerospace…)
>
> • Software engineering, knowledge engineering
>
> • Enterprise and system architecture
>
> • Government applications
>
> • <please suggest any more you feel have some good examples>
>
>
>
> While the original premise was for making the case in a return-on-investment
> basis, the suggestion has been made that this question could also be framed
> in terms of making the case:
>
> • For research investment
>
> • For using an ontological approach compared to other technical
> approaches (i.e. on its technical, rather than business, merits)
>
> • To the general public, to increase awareness and understanding
>
> • From a business perspective (the original suggestion)
>
>
>
> Possible metrics include:
>
> • Value in terms of productivity, value added, and other benefits
>
> • Financial ROI
>
> • Technical quality
>
> • Risk
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance for your interest and involvement. I think we have a
> promising topic.
>
>
>
> - On behalf of the Ontology Summit Organizing Committee
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
>
> Distinguished Research Fellow
>
> Carnegie Mellon University
>
> NASA Research Park
>
> Building 23 (MS 23-11)
>
> P.O. Box 1
> Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
>
> Email: steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> Phone: (650) 587-3780
>
> Cell: (202) 316-6481
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
> (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (03)
|