Dear Patrick, (01)
> I am curious who is the target of any eventual definition of ontology?
> Is this a definition that we want others (read outside the ontolog
> community) to use? And if so, for what purpose? (02)
MW: I agree. I think we need at least two levels of definition
- A level that will satisfy the pickiest of us here,
- The "elevator speach" level that you could use to explain what you
are doing to your financial controller/CEO.
> I think the same questions could be asked about whatever is
> going to be
> arranged along dimensions. After all, dimensions are chosen for a
> reason, that is with some outcome in mind that will result
> from ordering
> along a particular dimension.
> Hope you are at the start of a great week!
> Patrick (03)
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (04)