Well, it seems I should have started to read the newest emails first. :-) (01)
I agree. I removed the new additions and changed the text according to
Peter's suggestion.
Fabian (02)
Cecil Lynch wrote:
> I think this is a much better approach as well.
>
> Cecil
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> BEDFORD, DENISE A.D.
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 7:20 PM
> To: OntologySummit2010 Advisory Committee
> Cc: fneuhaus@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit-advisors] Comment for Communique - application
> domains for ontologists
>
> Peter,
>
> A much better approach, so I withdraw my suggestion for additional domains.
>
> Best regards,
> Denise
>
> ________________________________________
> From: ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [ontology-summit-advisors-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Peter F
> Brown (Pensive) [Peter@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 8:55 PM
> To: OntologySummit2010 Advisory Committee
> Cc: fneuhaus@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ontology-summit-advisors] Comment for Communique - application
> domains for ontologists
>
> As I understand the draft, the purpose of the section on application domains
> (2AV4 and following) is *not* to enumerate which applications domains are,
> or might be, of interest to ontologists, but rather to underline the fact
> that any domain can *benefit* from having ontologists analyse it and
> encapsulate an ontology for it.
>
> If we continue to add examples, people are going to start to look at what's
> missing and why (the process has already started with the requests for
> additions), and it won't end.
>
> Can I suggest another tack?
>
> "Any domain could be an application domain for ontologists. Ontologies are
> already used and are being developed for us in many domains, including in
> science, business, government, education, health and culture.
>
> "Having such ontologies not only facilitates human understanding of the
> characteristics of a particular domain and greater interoperability of
> information systems used in the domain, but also greater understanding and
> interoperability between domains."
>
> I have the same general remark to other instances in the text where examples
> are given: either give one, where the understanding might not be clear; or
> none at all.
>
> The objective is to clarify, not to enumerate exhaustively.
>
> Regards,
> Peter
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Committee Msg Archives:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Subscriber Config:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
> Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Committee Msg Archives:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Subscriber Config:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
> Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
> Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
> Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>
> (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Committee Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/
Subscriber Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (04)
|