Thank you, Rex and Bob ... do go into the RTDelphi study too. (01)
You can treat that Real-Time Delphi study site as a platform for
focused discussion to get convergence in 'developments' that may
important to the subject matter. Besides selecting the various radio
buttons to provide your 'best guess' on the time-frame each
development might happen, do go into the "answer forms" to share you
insights (and read what others have posted.) One should try to visit
that multiple times. (02)
I'll defer to Professor Arturo Sanchez or Dr. Antony Galton (who
designed and are administering Survey-1) to tell us how many have
responded to that. As for Survey-2 (mainly developed by Dr. Amanda
Vizedom), 32 people have responded to it. Regarding the Real-Time
Delphi "future" study, only 12 have participated so far (but hardly
anyone has gone beyond D-1 in terms of providing reasons, or
elaborated on the answer forms to each of the development. We do need
each and everyone's support so we can get a reasonable glimpse of what
the future may be like, through your eyes. (03)
... We have 100 Advsiors now, and that collective view and insight
should represent a fairly formidable vision on the future of this
field. (04)
ALL: Thanks in advance. (05)
Best regards. =ppy
-- (06)
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Bob Smith <bobsmithttl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> Done... should prove interesting and useful if enough surveys are completed.
> What is the current count for each of the 3?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bob (07)
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Rex Brooks <rexb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I filled out the second one. Not sure the third fits my work. I will
>> look it over later.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Rex (08)
>> Steve Ray wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear Colleagues,
>> >
>> > We are sending this email to request that you please respond to the
>> > surveys that we have set up to support the Ontology Summit 2010. We
>> > are depending on the full participation of the advisory committee so
>> > that we have a valid set of requirements and training resources, in
>> > order to produce a quality recommendation by the end of the Summit.
>> > You have been invited to be on the advisory committee specifically
>> > because we believe you have valuable insight on these matters, either
>> > on the requirements side, or on the training side, or sometimes both.
>> >
>> > We recognize how busy you all are, and appreciate your taking just a
>> > little of it on the surveys. The Real-time Delphi survey in particular
>> > is designed so that you can check back and see other responses between
>> > now and the closing (February 22^nd ) and update your own should you
>> > choose to do so – more like an asynchronous expert panel than a survey.
>> >
>> > The questionnaires can be found at
>> > http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010_Survey
>> >
>> > We thank you for your participation.
>> >
>> > Steven R. Ray and Barry Smith, Co-Chairs
>> >
>> > Ontology Summit 2010
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Committee Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit-advisors/ (010)
Subscriber Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit-advisors/
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
Community Discussion: : http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (011)
|