To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Thomas Johnston <tmj44p@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 26 Jun 2015 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) |
Message-id: | <1564938390.607776.1435348157024.JavaMail.yahoo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Thanks Matthew. I sometimes find computers frustrating. On Friday, June 26, 2015 3:35 AM, Matthew West <dr.matthew.west@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear Thomas, Are you trying to navigate the archive, or the copies you have received? I will answer for the latter. I don't seem to be able to navigate through threads. e.g. sometimes comments in a thread seem to be in chronological order, but at other times not. Does this actually happen? Are threads perhaps branching structures, not linear ones? [MW>] We each use our own email client, and they behave in different ways. Some differences are due to this. Other differences arise from writing styles. Most reply inline, though often deleting material not relevant to the reply (I sometimes do a <snip> when I do this). Others, like John are more creative, and pick out the quotes from the source email (or emails) and reorganises them to an order to support the points he wishes to make. Top posting (hitting reply and just answering in essentially a separate email) is frowned upon, because it forces the reader to read the email underneath to get the context. However, we all do it occasionally, but usually only with one liners. I don't know when to use Reply and when to use Reply All. Does Reply generate a comment that is visible only to the person being replied to? [MW>] Personally, I think you should only reply to the list. I know I don’t find it helpful to receive one copy directly and another from the list. At the end of some comments (is "messages" the term for one contribution to a thread?), I see "show original message". I'm not sure what that shows me that wasn't on the screen before I clicked on that option. [MW>] This is your email client I think just trying to be tidy. I know Google mail does that sort of thing. Are there instructions anywhere for using the machinery of threads/comments in this forum? [MW>] As far as I am aware, custom and practice has just grown (though it is just good netiquette), and when people don’t pick up on it, someone says something. Regards Matthew West Member – Ontolog Board of Trustees +44 750 338 5279 Thanks. Tom _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Need help on how to get around in this forum., John F Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Last CFP : CLA 2015: abstract & paper sumission up to July 5th 2015, Mailing Lists Box |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Need help on how to get around in this forum., John F Sowa |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Test etc., Ronald Stamper |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |