Here is a very interesting article in MedicalExpress.com
that documents how "educated" people claim knowledge and expertise
that doesn't even exist:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2015-06-people-easily-facts-impossible.html
I wonder why this behavior appears so widely among the
general population? I also wonder if that seeps over into the ontology
world. Does such a thing as a "river" exist in all cases where
rivers are postulated? Clearly not - a long time ago, JFS mentioned
rivers with no head waters, and rivers with no delta. Is the very idea of
a "concept" being overgeneralized by this mistaken confidence this
article suggests we have.
Sincerely,
Rich
Cooper,
Rich Cooper,
Chief Technology Officer,
MetaSemantics Corporation
MetaSemantics AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
( 9 4 9 ) 5 2 5-5 7 1 2
http://www.EnglishLogicKernel.com