Simon- I was hoping someone would bring
up FRBR in this thread. I would be interested to hear about your
take on it, as we are employing an approach inspired by FRBR in
OMG's API4KB Standard.
Tara
On 10/23/14, 12:33 PM, Simon Spero wrote:
This does discussion has wandered a bit far from the
subject of data/information object identities. If people are
still interested in that topic I have some experience in that
area, and have some opinions on the usefulness of relative
identity as a tool for analyzing models like FRBR, which I could
write an email on.
Higher order logics are useful, with the predicates
that must agree being treated as a set rather than the usual $
\forall \phi \in \Phi $.
Removing members from the set of predicates yields
different entities (or equivalence classes). These may represent
useful abstractions, or at least raise questions about other
abstractions.
Simon
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J