|From:||Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Thu, 23 Oct 2014 12:33:44 -0400|
On Oct 23, 2014 11:47 AM, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Industry is looking to add a 4th to this list: "Something you do". Basically, the act of playing a ... sequence of motions is used to create a profile of your responses that can be predictive.
That has been studied extensively, you advanced search example (!
This does discussion has wandered a bit far from the subject of data/information object identities. If people are still interested in that topic I have some experience in that area, and have some opinions on the usefulness of relative identity as a tool for analyzing models like FRBR, which I could write an email on.
Higher order logics are useful, with the predicates that must agree being treated as a set rather than the usual $ \forall \phi \in \Phi $.
Removing members from the set of predicates yields different entities (or equivalence classes). These may represent useful abstractions, or at least raise questions about other abstractions.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, William Frank|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, William Frank|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, William Frank|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, William Frank|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|