|From:||Jack Park <jackpark@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 22 Oct 2014 11:57:30 -0700|
That, in my view, supports discovery.
Each topic in the topic map then provides mappings to all of the known UUIDs associated with it.
My earlier comment spoke to the notion of using a topic map to handle not only every ontological definition, and every metadata schema, but also those "over-the-transom" representations that creep in over time. The idea is to federate all ways of knowing without disturbing any particular identification scheme.
It strikes me that metadata schemas are a great idea.But, I would like to suggest that the number of ways in which individuals and groups identify the subjects in their universe might be uncountable.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Gary Berg-Cross <gbergcross@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, Gary Berg-Cross|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, Barkmeyer, Edward J|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, Gary Berg-Cross|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] "Data/digital Object" Identities, Barkmeyer, Edward J|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|