|
On 4/27/14 11:18 PM, John F Sowa wrote:
I did *not* say that Schema.org is OWL-based. GoodRelations used OWL,
and Schema.org adopted GoodRelations but without all the OWL features.
I used the I term "OWL-level", but I should have been more precise.
Yes, precision is important here otherwise folks with jump to
utterly inaccurate conclusions about Schema.org.
GoodRelations is assimilated into Schema.org modulo its relation
semantics. Basically, GoodRelations will never go away, since in its
original form you have important semantics that aren't part of
Schema.org.
In sense, GoodRelation's perceived assimilation into Schema.org is
just another case of smart bridging that understands that there will
be a time (very soon) when we get beyond all the *myopic* syntax
& markup language distractions that currently obscure the value
and power of entity relation semantics.
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
|
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|