To: | rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Steven Ericsson-Zenith <steven@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2014 08:56:08 -0700 |
Message-id: | <CAAyxA7u4vazNYdN9+jJrncxecXhiHEbmjfwbtb_gq2DQYKZujA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Richard H. McCullough <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Even by this measure, which is not originally attributable to Rand, in what way are your "axioms" consistent with this definition? Note that I argue that the axiomatic method may be refined and strengthened with general covariance. Regards, Steven _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] mKR proof of correctness, Steven Ericsson-Zenith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] mKR proof of correctness, Barkmeyer, Edward J |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] mKR proof of correctness, Richard H. McCullough |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] E = mcg, Richard H. McCullough |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |