ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Schema.org v1.0e published: Order schema, Accessibil

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 15:23:36 -0500
Message-id: <529F8F48.2000009@xxxxxxxxxxx>
On 12/4/2013 11:57 AM, Kingsley Idehen wrote:
> Awesome on both fronts re., schema.org version 1.0e and LOV's cool delta
> page!    (01)

I wouldn't go quite as far as "awesome", but I agree that Schema.org
is an important step in the right direction:    (02)

  1. It is compatible with all the tools for the Semantic Web.    (03)

  2. But it is sufficiently general that it can be used with legacy
     systems and with the many logics, tools, and notations that have
     been developed over the past half century for AI, databases, and
     programming languages.    (04)

  3. The presentation in the web pages that Dan B cites can be read and
     used by programmers who have little or no training in the tools and
     notations of the Semantic Web or any of the many versions of logic
     that are used in ontology and computer science.    (05)

  4. The lack of detail in Schema.org does not permit detailed reasoning.
     But that makes it sufficiently underspecified that it can be used in
     conjunction with an open-ended variety of "microtheories" that state
     whatever detail is required for any particular application.    (06)

  5. The emphasis on readable English terms and phrases for the ontology
     means that Schema.org can be used as a supplement to specialized
     terminologies and lexical resources, such as WordNet, Roget's
     Thesaurus, and various systems used by computational linguists.    (07)

  6. The availabilty of Schema.org as a free and open resource is
     essential for its widespread adoption.    (08)

  7. Equally important is the collaboration by four major competitors:
     Bing, Google, Yahoo!, and Yandex.  Their support ensures the
     funding, and their competition ensures that none of them will
     tolerate proprietary features that favor one vendor's software
     over the others'.    (09)

John    (010)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>