ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Extensional vs Intensional semantics for RDF/RDFS [w

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: John McClure <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:21:15 -0800
Message-id: <5296A89B.4090604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 11/24/2013 3:27 PM, Pat Hayes wrote:
> [I just noticed that there is no property defined on Statement for the fourth 
>part of the quad, which seems odd given the new concrete syntax for quads
> Quads are not part of official RDF. RDF graphs are (normatively) required to 
>consist of triples. But also, the reification vocabulary is, if not 
>deprecated, widely considered to be archaic and is kept in the spec only for 
>legacy reasons. That section of the new spec is copied almost verbatim from 
>the old one, relegated to an appendix.
>
> Pat
>
Curious what should be used when a reified statement is needed. 
Wikipages should be able to store rdf:Statements, so I'm interested in 
why it's archaic, it suggests a replacement exists. Seems reasonable 
that a topic can be a container of Statements.    (01)

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (02)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>