ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Computer science ontology vs. philosophical ontology

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Avril Styrman <Avril.Styrman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 21:21:50 +0200
Message-id: <20131028212150.Horde.mX-fZnHITNu5yFyYGXjKUw2.astyrman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanx for the update,    (01)

>> When we order the computer to list all red objects, the computer  lists
>> all members of the class red. This is useful in the linguistic sense
>
> No, it's not.    (02)

The point was to propose the potential field of application as the criterion
by which we classify ontologies. If class nominalism finds application, it
finds it in NL processing rather than in chemistry.    (03)

Avril
Ystävällisin terveisin,    (04)

Avril Styrman
avril.styrman@xxxxxxxxxxx
puh. +358 40 7000 589    (05)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (06)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>