|From:||William Frank <williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 27 May 2013 23:44:34 -0400|
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:49 PM, <jmcclure@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
noun is a grammatical category, I would not model nouns **or any other** grammatical category, unless I was specifying the grammar for some language that had nouns,.
Right, that is where we differ. For example, the fact that the predicate has the role burried in it, using position to represent role, gives you lots more concepts than really are needed. Fatherhood is one concept, with two roles. we need two separrate words in english, child of and father of. In a logical deep structure, there is only one concept, and many ways to say it in the same and different languages.
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] is-part-of: a really, really, bad practice?, William Frank|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Spatial Extent of Abstract Entities?, Patrick Cassidy|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] is-part-of: a really, really, bad practice?, jmcclure|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] is-part-of: a really, really, bad practice?, David C. Hay|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|