|
On 3/21/2013 6:52 AM, Steven
Ericsson-Zenith wrote:
Peirce's simple example is: "A gives B to C" which is impossible to capture in dyadic form.
I have no clue of why (1) one needs only dyadic relations for being
"processed into formal logic" (whatever that means), nor (2) why
this example is showing the purported "impossibility": indeed any
relation of any arity can be decomposed into compositions of dyadic
relations (not that I see the need for it but ...); to wit,
gives(A,,to(B,C)).
But I'm sure my ignorance of such "deep" issues explains my silly
comment ... ;-)
--
-hak
|
hak.vcf
Description: Vcard
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|