To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx |
Date: | Mon, 18 Mar 2013 02:04:17 -0400 (EDT) |
Message-id: | <8be1fa92a4ae5e37586bd4c91af21c88.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Amanda and Leo, Your comments sound painfully familiar. I am becomming more and more convinced that any language generated by humans must be considered unrestricted NL -- even when they claim that they are using some specialized language or terminology. I believe that it is easier to process unrestricted NL as written by humans who are writing for other humans than it is to correct the errors in the artificial languages written by humans who are writing for machines. John _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Fwd: [Attempto] CfP Human-Rules - Processing Rules in Natural Language, Simon Spero |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Fwd: MOVED: Re: [ontology-summit] Hackathon: BACnet Ontology, sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Fwd: MOVED: Re: [ontology-summit] Hackathon: BACnet Ontology, Obrst, Leo J. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Fwd: MOVED: Re: [ontology-summit] Hackathon: BACnet Ontology, David Eddy |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |