Pat, (01)
As Simon mentions, this was a quote attributed to Whorf in the SEP at
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/linguistics/#Who, and it got a bit mangled
when Rich reported it. (02)
I think the Whorf or Sapir-Whorf hypothesis (or non-hypothesis) suffers
greatly. But the above article does tease out some of the usual positions. (03)
Thanks,
Leo (04)
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Pat Hayes
>Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 7:01 PM
>To: Rich Cooper
>Cc: [ontolog-forum]
>Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis
>
>
>On Feb 23, 2013, at 3:39 PM, Rich Cooper wrote:
>
>Simon Spero wrote:
>> the world is presented in a kaleidoscopic flux of impressions which has to
>be organized by our minds-and this means largely by the linguistic systems
>in our minds.
>
>Does it mean that? I find this claim to be highly doubtful, myself. I have, at
>many times in my life, had to think and act while my mental linguistic
>system was not functioning at all, and found that my thinking was
>unimpaired by a temporary (epilepsy-induced) total aphasia. But in any case,
>this idea that thought somehow *is* language seems unlikely on a variety of
>grounds. I know I am not alone in being able to think many thoughts that I
>find it hard to utter in language - in some cases, impossible to do so. Why
>would this be true, if thought simply were language, or if it used the
>"linguistic system" in our minds? Again, I can often time-share thinking and
>language use, for example following a chain of thought while listening to
>spoken instructions or even holding a conversation. And, it is known that
>linguistic functionality is localized to comparatively small areas of the
>cortex
>(the left temporal and prefronal lobes), so if our minds *are* the linguistic
>system in our minds, what is the rest of this (biologically very expensive)
>neural tissue for?
>
>Does Spero give any evidence for this very strong, and I think extremely
>implausible, claim that it is our mental linguistic system which provides the
>categories for thought?
>
>Pat Hayes
>
>------------------------------------------------------------
>IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973
>40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office
>Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax
>FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile
>phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
>
>
>
>
>
>
>___________________________________________________________
>______
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (06)
|