Leo -On Feb 29, 2012, at 9:09 AM, Obrst, Leo J. wrote: Almost every “view” or “context” has two components: 1) the ontology view, i.e., the projection of a subset of classes, properties, axioms, etc., from the ontology, to satisfy a specific application need, and 2) the vocabulary to be associated with the elements of the ontology view.
I think I agree.
So what's the purpose/value/utility of the ontology view?
If grunts are working away with their local vocabularies/jargon/local opaque language (& VERY unlikely to be aware of the ontology in the background), what is the value add of the ontology? ___________________ David Eddy
781-455-0949 |