On 4/27/2011 4:23 PM, doug foxvog wrote:
> I would prefer to restrict the concept of ontology to a description
> of some field of concern that specifies various classes of thing,
> relations that may obtain among instances of such classes, and
> relationships among such things. (01)
Yes. That is close to what I suggested in response to Doug S: (02)
JFS
> If you want a definition, following is my recommended definition
> of 'an ontology': a theory about what exists in some domain. (03)
In general, my definitions are closer to those by Doug F.
WordNet is not an ontology, since it is not a theory. (04)
But it is possible to have an incompletely specified theory
as an informal ontology. (05)
John (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (07)
|