To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | FERENC KOVACS <f.kovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 4 Feb 2011 15:35:02 +0000 (GMT) |
Message-id: | <215880.74198.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi, This subject has been covered at least once in the past. See:
Subjectline: event ontology from 09/2009 with a good point made by Azamat saying:
Azamat: Imo, most confusion could be avoided with its adequate defining as "a change happening at a given place/time, followed and caused by some other events (changes, acts, or actions)." I am inclined to think that the current downgrading of event as a real world "nonevent" comes from its poor ontological study." Ferenc _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Presentism etc, Ronald Stamper |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1, doug foxvog |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] 3D+1 (was presentism...was blah blah blah), Pat Hayes |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Fw: Presentism etc, sean barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |