[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Interesting observation about OWL ontologies

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:57:58 +0300
Message-id: <AANLkTi=fBnw4SRFzVXPAoh642AuD1G1frVUY8a6yHUKe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

as we discussed at "[semanticweb] Fwd: Breaking News: Google supports GoodRelations" thread
during 07.11.10
may be it's better to look at OWL vocabulary used in ontologies.

For ex. for GoodRelations we have:


very interesting collection.


2011/1/13 John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Yes.  I noticed that point as soon as I saw my own note in the inbox,
and I sent off the correction just before I found your note.

> That SPARQL query returns all relationships between the same class, so
> what's being exposed here is not a hierarchy, but a test to see what
> relationships exist between x and x.

I apologize for not proofreading my own note *before* I sent it.


Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>