Re: [ontolog-forum] language vs logic - ambiguity and starting with defi

[David Eddy <deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Alex -

On Sep 18, 2010, at 5:00 AM, Alex Shkotin wrote:

But if you just need definition of definition why not use definition 2.a from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definition

I have an EXCELLENT reason why to NOT use http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/definition

Cookies!

Are you aware of the Wall Street Journal series about privacy (the lack there-of) on the web?   If memory serves www.dictionary.com (which owns Merriam-Webster) is hands down the worst offender for putting tracking cookies on your computer.  Hit dictionary.com for how to spell obesity correctly & you'll be dogged by weight-loss ads.  Age appropriate, of course, since they already know that about you.  Nice, eh?

Today's installment...  http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703904304575497903523187146.html?mod=WSJ_hps_LEADNewsCollection    I have no idea what cookies you'll pick up by following that URL, or if the URL will work at all.

___________________

David Eddy

deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

781-455-0949

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)