ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Triangles and Meanings

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Rick Murphy'" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 11:57:28 -0700
Message-id: <20100908185734.CA7E2138CD0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Avril,    (01)

I don't think gravity is an example of the kind of thirdness that Peirce
indicated because gravity doesn't get a sign and make an interpretant
associate with it.  This is just a gravitational function of two variables,
g(A,B) where A and B are the two objects gravitating.      (02)

But even functions with three parameters aren't necessarily the
implementation of that thirdness concept which requires an interpreter.      (03)

JMHO,
-Rich    (04)

Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2    (05)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avril Styrman
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 12:40 PM
To: [ontolog-forum] ; Rick Murphy
Cc: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Triangles and Meanings    (06)

Dear all,    (07)

now that you talk again about triads, I want to ask that does anybody  
have objections to the following use of Peirce's triads.    (08)

-Masses of planets A and B are both individual firstnesses.    (09)

-The gravitational force that acts between between A and B is an  
individual secondness.    (010)

-The law of gravitation is thirdness. Thirdness can be called  
universal, because it can be found everywhere, at least on the scale  
of compact stellar objects.    (011)


I think that this is a good example of how Peirce's triads can be  
applied. Any objections?    (012)

Avril    (013)




Lainaus "Rick Murphy" <rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:    (014)

> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 19:32 -0500, Christopher Menzel wrote:
>> On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 19:56 -0400, Jon Awbrey wrote:
>> > Rick,
>> >
>> > ...a lot of confusion can be avoided if we keep this distinction and
>> > associated facts in mind.
>>
>> As the kids say (and as seems especially appropriate): Word!  Would that
>> your sage advice were actually to be heeded in this forum.
>
> Apparently, when our science fails, all we have left is just words.
>
>> Chris Menzel
>>
>
> --
> Rick
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>    (015)



-- 
Always forward towards the supreme maxim of scientific philosophizing    (016)


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (017)



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (018)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>