[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] owl2 and cycL/cycML

To: Ian Horrocks <ian.horrocks@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Bernardo Cuenca Grau <bcuencagrau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Zhuk, Yefim" <Yefim.Zhuk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 15:15:21 -0400
Message-id: <DEF4602BC4132240B68479642E1DD27F96C9D6E38C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Thanks for another great event related to OWL2.


What is your opinion on CycL and CycML (see http://cyc.com)?


From my point of view, this language is more expressive than OWL and has naturally embedded rules features.

I used this language to describe complex objects and rule-based business scenarios.

I think, this comes much closer to mimicking real world than OWL can provide today.


Do you see this one as gaining bigger acceptance and getting to the level of a standard?


Or maybe there are some limitations that I don’t see?


Thank you,




Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>