On Mar 10, 2010, at 1:35 AM, Matthew West wrote:
> [Duane wrote:]
>> For the second of these (conflicts when the same concept is represented by
>different types), can you elaborate a couple of examples (no hurry). I just
>want to make sure I have a good idea of this.
>
> MW: Well I guess representing something that exists in space-time as a 3D or
>4D individual would count. (01)
I don't think it's that subtle -- moreover, I don't think I would count your
interesting example as a case of the same concept being represented by
different types (or whatever), since it doesn't seem to me that "3D-individual"
and "4D-individiual" *are* the same concept. I think all they have in mind are
cases where the same concept is indicated by different type *names*, e.g.,
"woodchuck" and "groundhog". (02)
-chris (03)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)
|