ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Foundation ontology, CYC, and Mapping

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Sjir Nijssen" <sjir.nijssen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:20:52 +0100
Message-id: <F38470BA22AAE34EA3827025B08092510778D8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Dear Matthew,
 
Very interesting figures.
 
Could you tell us how many properties or attributes were associated with the 1700 entity types?
 
Kind regards
 
Sjir Nijssen


From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Matthew West
Sent: Fri 2/5/2010 10:13 AM
To: '[ontolog-forum] '
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Foundation ontology, CYC, and Mapping

Dear Ed and Dave,

Quite.

> > P.S.  I realize that by guessing at what Dave meant, I may be
> > constructing the strawman I am knocking down.  My apologies if I am
> > well
> > wide of the mark.
> [DMc] It's not perfect, but I don't see why you wouldn't start with an
> FO that has been rigorously debated and disambiguated as a starting
> point.  Our experience is that it was useful.

MW: As another example, about 5 years ago when I was still working for Shell
I was charged with developing a conceptual data model for Shell's Downstream
business (oil tanker to petrol pump). We started with ISO 15926 as a
foundation ontology, and developed a 1700 entity type data model in 12
months with a team of ten people. This would normally just not work:

 - A team of ten people will usually fail to agree on how to model things,
 - If you let ten people model independently different areas they will come
up with incompatible models,
 - If you have a team of 2-3 people it will take a lot longer than a year to
produce 1700 entity types.

Because we had a foundation ontology that we had confidence in as an
analysis framework we did not suffer these problems.

I presented the project at a DAMA conference and one of our major
competitors was present. After the presentation I asked what they thought
such a model would cost them to develop. They said $5m. It actually cost
$1m.

Whether foundation ontologies play much role in reasoning, is I think rather
to miss the point.

Regards

Matthew West                           
Information  Junction
Tel: +44 560 302 3685
Mobile: +44 750 3385279
matthew.west@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.informationjunction.co.uk/
http://www.matthew-west.org.uk/

This email originates from Information Junction Ltd. Registered in England
and Wales No. 6632177.
Registered office: 2 Brookside, Meadow Way, Letchworth Garden City,
Hertfordshire, SG6 3JE.




_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>